Publication Ethics

The Journal of Law, Technology, and Human Rights (JLTR) is a peer-reviewed publication issued by Lexterra Scientia, Indonesia. It is available online and adheres strictly to publication ethics, avoiding all forms of plagiarism. This statement outlines the ethical standards expected from all participants in the publication process, including the authors, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board, peer reviewers, and the publisher (Lexterra Scientia). It follows the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors as established by COPE.

Ethical Standards for Journal Publication

Publishing an article in the Journal of Law, Technology, and Human Rights (JLTR) is a fundamental element in cultivating a cohesive and respected body of knowledge. It directly reflects the caliber of the authors' work and the institutions that support them, with peer-reviewed articles embodying the scientific method. Thus, it is crucial to uphold established ethical standards for all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, editors, peer reviewers, the publisher, and associated societies.

As the publisher of JLTR, Lexterra Scientia is committed to upholding the integrity of all publishing stages and acknowledges its ethical obligations and responsibilities. We are dedicated to ensuring that commercial interests, such as advertising and reprints, do not influence editorial decisions. Additionally, Lexterra Scientia and the Editorial Board are prepared to facilitate communication with other journals and publishers as necessary and appropriate.

Decisions on Publication

The editor of JLTR is responsible for determining which submitted articles are published, with decisions driven by the work's validation and relevance to researchers and readers. These decisions are guided by the journal's editorial policies and must comply with legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may consult with colleagues and reviewers to inform their decisions.

Principle of Fair Evaluation

Manuscripts are evaluated solely on intellectual merit, without regard to the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic background, citizenship, or political ideology.

Confidentiality Standards

The editor and editorial staff are required to maintain the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts, disclosing information only to those directly involved in the review and publication process, including the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Management

Unpublished material from submitted manuscripts must not be used by editorial board members for their research without explicit written consent from the authors. Any privileged information or suggestions obtained during the manuscript review process must remain confidential and not be used for personal gain. Editors must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where there is a potential conflict of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors, institutions, or entities connected to the manuscript.

Handling Unethical Conduct

Editors, in collaboration with the publisher, are tasked with addressing ethical concerns related to submitted or published work in a fair and sensitive manner. Any identified unethical publishing behavior will be investigated and addressed, regardless of when it is discovered. The Journal of Law, Technology, and Human Rights has appointed legal experts specializing in Intellectual Property to the Ethics Advisory Board, as mandated by the Director of Lexterra Scientia.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review plays a crucial role in the editorial decision-making process. By providing detailed feedback, reviewers not only assist editors in making informed decisions but also help authors enhance the quality of their manuscripts through constructive communication.

Timeliness: Reviewers who feel they lack the expertise required to evaluate the research in a manuscript, or who are unable to complete the review promptly, should promptly notify the editor and recuse themselves from the review process to ensure timely handling of the manuscript.

Confidentiality: Manuscripts under review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers should not share or discuss the content with others unless explicitly authorized by the editor. This confidentiality extends to all aspects of the review process.

Objectivity and Professionalism: Reviews should be conducted with objectivity and without personal bias. Personal criticism directed at the author is inappropriate. Reviewers are expected to articulate their evaluations clearly, supporting their views with logical reasoning and evidence.

Recognition of Sources: Reviewers should identify any relevant works that the authors have not cited. If a reviewer identifies that a significant observation or argument has been previously published, they should provide the appropriate citation. Additionally, reviewers should inform the editor of any substantial similarities or overlap between the manuscript under review and other published works of which they are aware.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Information and ideas obtained during the review process must remain confidential and not be used for personal advantage. Reviewers should avoid reviewing manuscripts where they have conflicts of interest, whether due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the work.

Responsibilities of Authors

Reporting Standards: Authors should provide an accurate and thorough account of the research performed, along with an unbiased discussion of its significance. The manuscript should include sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. The presentation of falsified or intentionally misleading data is considered unethical and unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention: Authors may be required to submit raw data alongside their manuscript for editorial review and should be willing to make such data publicly accessible if possible, in accordance with standards like the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases. Authors should also be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable period after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that their work is original. If they have used the work or words of others, these must be appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism in any form is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication: Authors should not publish manuscripts that describe essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously is considered unethical and is not permitted.

Acknowledgment of Sources: Authors must give proper acknowledgment to all those who have influenced the nature of the reported work. They should cite publications that have significantly shaped their research.

Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be attributed only to those who have made a significant intellectual contribution to the study, including its conception, design, execution, or interpretation. All individuals who have made substantial contributions should be listed as co-authors, and all co-authors should have reviewed and approved the final manuscript before submission. The corresponding author has the responsibility to ensure that only appropriate co-authors are included.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Authors should disclose any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be interpreted as influencing the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of funding and financial support for the research must be disclosed.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is their responsibility to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate in retracting or correcting the paper as necessary.